The answer to this question varies depending on the specific frequency band in which the FM station with the canceled license operates.
FAQ Category: LPFM Radio Filing Window
Inquiries regarding the LPFM application submission period and actions leading up to the FCC’s determination on the application.
What is the timeframe within which I must complete construction after receiving my construction permit?
LPFM construction permits, whether for new or existing stations, are initially valid for 36 months (as per §73.3598(a)). Extensions beyond this period are only granted under exceptional circumstances, such as natural disasters, administrative and judicial reviews, or international coordination matters, in accordance with the FCC’s tolling policies (§73.3598(b)).
Are there any strategies I can employ to lower my HAAT and boost my ERP if my position is within 16 kilometers of either the coastline or a foreign nation?
The Height Above Average Terrain (HAAT) is typically calculated based on the average elevations at 50 evenly-spaced points along 8 radials in 45-degree increments (0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and so on). These 50 elevation points along each radial are first averaged, and then these radial averages are further averaged and compared to the antenna’s radiation center’s height above sea level to determine the HAAT.
If it’s not possible to establish an LPFM station at a particular location, does this imply that a translator station also cannot be located there?
It’s important to note that this isn’t always the case, and there are several reasons behind this difference. The manner in which FM translators safeguard other broadcast facilities, including full-power stations, LPFM stations, and other translators, differs significantly from how LPFM stations provide protection.
Is there still a possibility for me to succeed if I’m part of an MX group but don’t have the highest score among the applicants?
Yes, there is still a chance for applicants in an MX (Mutually Exclusive) group who do not have the highest score. While scoring is a significant factor in the MX selection process, other factors such as settlement agreements, time-sharing arrangements, and unique circumstances can also influence the outcome.
If a public safety entity requests multiple stations, even at the same tower, are they required to make a showing of why they need multiple stations.
Yes, public safety entities are typically required to provide a justification when requesting multiple stations, even if they are located at the same tower site. This justification helps ensure that their allocation of multiple stations is necessary and serves a legitimate public safety purpose. The FCC may review and evaluate these requests to determine their validity and whether they align with the public interest and safety requirements.
Is it possible for a 5-point applicant to enter into a settlement agreement with a 4-point applicant during the 90-day settlement window?
During the 90-day settlement window, a 5-point applicant can reach an agreement with a 4-point applicant. In fact, any combination of applicants can reach a settlement agreement during this window, regardless of their point totals. The key is to come to an agreement that resolves the mutual exclusivity (MX) issue for that particular channel. Points may help determine who gets priority in selecting hours in a time-share agreement, but they don’t restrict who can negotiate a settlement.
Is it accurate that when the 90-day window public notice is issued, the FCC will only select the top 3 applicants (based on local community dates), and the other top-scoring applicants will be dismissed?
No, that’s not accurate. In an MX (mutually exclusive) group, all equally qualified applicants will be considered tentative selectees. The local community presence dates will only come into play as a tiebreaker if the group defaults and a settlement or time-sharing agreement cannot be reached. In other words, the FCC will generally select all equally qualified applicants as tentative selectees to promote fairness and inclusivity in the process.
Is it possible for an applicant to suggest a different channel and combine their points as part of a comprehensive solution in the LPFM application process?
No, an applicant cannot propose a different channel and aggregate their points as part of an overall solution during the MX (Mutually Exclusive) application process for LPFM (Low-Power FM) stations.
How can I challenge the score determination of another MX applicant?
To challenge the score determination of another MX applicant, you can follow these steps: